You can search for articles in back issues of Contingencies from July/August 2000 to March/April 2009 using the search box to the right. Simply type in subject words, author's name, or article title and click search. To search for articles from May/June 2009 to the present, go to the current digital issue of the magazine and use the search function on the left of the top navigation bar.

Google Custom Search


Tough Love

by Steve Sullivan

PDF version


EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT THE WEATHER, but nobody ever does anything about it. Except actuaries. They decide what people have to pay to insure against the effects of disastrous weather and determine how much insurance companies need to set aside to pay the resulting claims—without putting the companies out of business.

When the topic switches to insurance companies, it’s usually to complain about how high the rates are, how unfair insurers are, and how much money they make at the expense of just about everybody.

This issue of Contingencies is about risk management and actuaries. (See stories on pages 24 and 34.) It was being put together just as Hurricane Katrina was taking apart New Orleans and the Gulf Coasts of Mississippi and Alabama. This article was being written as Hurricane Rita smacked down on Texas. And the season still isn’t over yet.

Fortunately, the issue of how well federal and local governments managed the risk of two impending Category 5 storms isn’t up to the actuaries. What is up to the actuaries is how well their companies managed that risk.

According to Chris Guidette at the Insurance Services Office in New Jersey, the industry as a whole seems to have managed it pretty well, with more than enough reserves to weather both storms. (How individual companies will fare, only time will tell.)

The real crunch will come when insurers have to separate wind and rain losses from flood losses.

“Flood losses aren’t covered by commercial or personal property insurance sold on the voluntary market,” says Guidette. “You have to buy separate flood coverage, which is underwritten by the federal government with commercial companies acting as fronting agents. Adjusters, policyholders, and carriers will have to decide whether water losses are covered under catastrophic coverage contained in the property policy or not. The flood- catastrophe question could become a hotly contested issue.”

One Mississippi congressman has introduced legislation that would make flood coverage retroactive for homeowners affected by “Katrita.” Even consumer advocate J. Robert Hunter doesn’t think that’s such a good idea. But according to a Sept. 21 editorial in the Washington Post, the federal flood insurance program does virtually the same thing anyway. Why buy flood insurance when you already know the government will bail you out? Not only that, but it’ll pay you to rebuild in exactly the same flood-prone place.

“We’ve created trillions of dollars of ‘insurance guzzlers’ on beaches and earthquake faults through state rate suppression, residual markets, cat funds, and the federal flood program,” says Rade Musulin, vice president and actuary with the Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Co. “People living in those property Hummers expect that they have a right to rebuild and continue getting their $1.299 premium insurance.

“The problem is that rate suppression and residual markets can only hide this elephant for so long, and eventually we have to pay billions and billions to finance that right to rebuild. Eventually, the cost of the disasters will result in fewer schools being built, inflation, or other ills.

“We’re going to have to take many painful steps to address this problem, including charging a lot more for insurance and depopulating high-risk areas. We have to tell people that if they get paid off one time and if their damage is more than 50 percent, they get a cash settlement and they cannot rebuild.”

Actuaries aren’t politicians. Long before the storm hits, they’re the ones who have to make the tough choices, the unpopular choices. And, as long as the insurance companies are still there to hand out the checks, the right choices.

EDITOR


Contingencies (ISSN 1048-9851) is published by the American Academy of Actuaries, 1100 17th St. NW, 7th floor, Washington, DC 20036. The basic annual subscription rate is included in Academy dues. The nonmember rate is $24. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC, and at additional mailing offices. BPA circulation audited.

This article may not be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission of the publisher. Opinions expressed in signed articles are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official policy of the American Academy of Actuaries.

November/December 2005

Enterprise Risk Management for Insurers: Actuarial Theory in Practice

Operational Risk: The New Frontier

Fundamental Changes

Social Security Reform: What's the Best Fix?

Inside Track:
Tough Love

Letters

Commentary:
Is One Euro of Actuaries Worth the Same as One Euro of Financial Economists?

Policy Briefing:
Mr. Smith Comes to the Academy

Workshop:
Turning the Tables: Mortality Tables Should Reflect Improving Mortality

Tradecraft:
Understanding Insurance, Part I: Comparing Written Premium With Paid Losses

Puzzles:
Tax Season Hiring

Endpaper:
A Tribute to My Father


Past Issues

Contact us


American Academy of Actuaries